In years past if
business executives needed to travel they were required to hop in line at the
airport just like everyone else. They would spend all day checking in to the
airport flying to their meeting and getting on the next plane home over the
course of 24 hours. Corporate aviation has made it possible, however, for
businesses to fly to multiple meetings in a day in multiple locations and still
be home in time for dinner; it eliminates the long security lines, the baggage claims,
the planes can land in smaller airports with less traffic, this brings business
to more airports, smaller communities and FBO’s. The general image of corporate
flying is one of needless, luxurious travel but the general public doesn’t know
the truth behind corporate flying. Attending meetings in multiple states in the
same day opens up the opportunity to close deals at a much quicker pace than
was previously possible. Where one person might only be able to fit so many
commercial flights into week, corporate aviation has made it possible to fly
anywhere anytime at the drop of a hat and even hold meetings on the plane
itself. Corporate aviation is not only an important part of the economy but it
is an essential part of it according to GAMA/IAMAW corporate aviation lends to
60% of the United States exports and USA Today reports that it creates 1.2
million jobs and generates $150 billion per year.
Recently
Corporate Aviation has come under attack from the President who wishes to
repeal a law that he signed a few years ago that gives Business Aviation
programs the right to use Accelerated Depreciation on newly bought aircraft,
which means that for accounting purposes aircraft depreciate faster in the beginning
which allows companies larger deductibles. This benefit was part of the
stimulus package that the President signed in 2010 to help encourage economic
growth but recently the President has changed his mind, according to CNS News
the President is under the opinion that companies who can afford to pay for
their own aircraft can afford to pay more taxes and if unwilling to do so it
will be America’s children who suffer for it through higher tuition and cuts to
education.
While
the country’s deficit is growing larger, the President’s view on raising taxes
on corporate aviation was not received well by the industry. According to USA
Today Ed Bolen the CEO of NBAA sent a response to the President reminding him
of the jobs that corporate aviation has created across the country, and
according to the EAA Pete Bunce, the President of GAMA would like to know how
the Obama administration plans on meeting its goal of doubling exports if it
plans on cutting into the industry that is responsible for the majority of
exported goods.
In
my opinion the tax cuts are not only a bad idea, but are not even worth it. USA
Today states that the cuts will only produce $3 billion over 10 years and in
that same amount of time the deficit is projected to be $7.2 trillion. I
believe that the cuts are a drop in the bucket and would cause more harm to the
industry and the economy than it would benefit it. Not to mention that as
accelerated depreciation goes, the largest deductibles for companies are in the
first few years, as depreciation slows later in the aircraft's lifespan the
deduction will increase generating more tax dollars. If you ask me, the money
needs to come from somewhere else.
Eaa applauds gama/iamaw response to attack on aviation
industry. (2011, June 29). Retrieved from http://www.eaa.org/news/2011/2011-06-29_gama.asp
Fernholz, T. (2011, June 29). Obama’s taxing corporate
jet policy. Retrieved from
http://www.nationaljournal.com/obama-s-taxing-corporate-jet-policy-20110629
Lucas, F. (2011, June 30). Obama for corporate jet tax
break before he was against it - see more at:
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-corporate-jet-tax-break-he-was-against-it
Wolf, R. (2011, June 30). Obama targets private jets, big
oil. Retrieved from
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/06/obama-targets-corporate-jets-hedge-funds-big-oil/1
This is something I dislike about politics, where cuts are made with no real knowledge in the area, just to appease public outcry. The concept of accelerated depreciation has been in existence for years and has been utilized in other industries. For corporate aviation, it is one of the main factors that incentivize companies to be efficient. Presently, corporate aviation is thriving thanks to the NBAA, GAMA and other concerned parties who lobbied to have the Obama Administration, in January 2013, sign a two year extension of the Bonus Depreciation.
ReplyDeleteMike if corporate aviation contributes to exportation, then not only will the corporate company slow down, make job cuts and be inefficient but the ripple effect will be felt in the export markets. Ultimately, rural airports, FBOs and rural communities will also suffer.
I think that the benefits of corporate aviation outweigh the bad. I believe politics plays a huge role with the negative light that has been shed on corporate aviation. I think that maybe taxes should be raised but, does it take the president to attack the idea of corporate aviation in order for people to see that it needs to have changes made to the current policy. I believe that taxes should be raised but the president should be trying to increase the peoples good perceptions of the corporate aviation world.
ReplyDelete